Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
I’ve posted a new looong article on Compilation and Deployment with ASP.NET 2.0 in the Articles section of the site. This article also ran in CoDe magazine this month:
Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0
Compilation and deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 has brought some of the biggest changes to the ASP.NET development model. As developers we use page compilation all day long and deployment is something we all have to worry about sooner or later. A lot has changed in both areas and they can affect how you build and deploy your applications so understanding how the model works is crucial. In this article I'll provide a detailed discussion of how compilation and deployment works. I'll also talk about the new Web Deployment Projects and Web Application Projects add-ins that Microsoft is providing to ease some of the pain points of the stock functionality shipped with ASP.NET 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005.
This entry is a placeholder link to allow comments and questions. For longer or more detailed discussions I suggest posting a question on our Message Board.
The Voices of Reason
# well done
great article, a must read for anyone doing asp.net development - Scott G should mention this on his blogs
thanks for all the effort & time you must have put into figuring this out and preparing a 'digested' understandable version
it seems the deployment of stock projects without WDP add-in is indeed a complete writeoff - makes you wonder - what were they thinking ?
--
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
We are currently using WDP with the stock option, because of the speed advantages when working on the web layer.
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
Thanks a lot for the fantastic article. Is it correct to say that, technically, CodeBeside is just CodeBehind broken up into two partial classes, or is there more to it than that?
Thanks.
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
But yeah, it's based on the same concept as CodeBehind in ASP.NET 1.1 one, meaning only codebehind code is compiled into a single assembly.
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
Writing software in Hawaii, that sounds like heaven.
Thanks.
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted
Thanks for your time Rik, its realy appreciated
Tom
# re: Compilation and Deployment in ASP.NET 2.0 Article posted